Advanced Search
NCETM
NCETM - Working collaboratively to enhance mathematics teaching
HomeNewsResourcesCourses & EventsResearchCommunitiesBlogsMathemapediaSelf-evaluation
Login
User Name / Email Address:
Password:
Join | Forgotten password?


 
  North West West Midlands South West South East London East of England East Midlands Yorkshire and the Humber North East

A lesson without...


Comment on this item Send to printer  
 
Add to your NCETM favourites
Remove from your NCETM favourites
Add a note on this item
Recommend to a friend
Comment on this item
Send to printer

A lesson without the opportunity for learners to generalise (mathematically) is not a mathematics lesson

A lesson without the opportunity for learners to generalise (mathematically) is not a mathematics lesson

Mathematics is fundamentally about becoming aware of and expressing generality.
Contents
1 Main Section
2 Probes and Prompts
3 Taking Action
4 Case Studies
5 Research Sources
6 See Also

Main Section

No-one expects young children to memorise all two-digit additions and subtractions. Rather learners are expected to reconstruct a collection of general methods which will enable them to carry out not only all two digit additions and subtractions, but any additions and subtractions. So even the youngest of children are expected to generalise.

Caleb Gattegno (ref.) once said that “something is mathematical only if it is shot through with infinity”. By this he meant that there is some generality present, however limited (even to finite cases!). [see Freedom & Constraint]

When several or many separate experiences or objects are subsumed under a single heading, there is a slight frisson of excitement.  Human beings operate by classifying things under headings so that they don’t have to deal with a plethora of single and individual items. This is reflected in language, where each noun provides a label for a whole class of objects. Words like  ‘cup’, ‘chair’, ‘number’ and ‘triangle’ can be used to describe a whole range of objects with certain properties. Through the use of labels to summarise properties, actual or potential infinity is tamed.  

If learners are left on their own to generalise in a lesson, without considerable explicit exposure to useful mathematical generalisations, then they are likely to form generalisations about the teacher’s behaviour, and about their relationship to mathematics as a whole. For example, if tasks consistently use the same types of questions, learners are likely to form the impression ( a generalisation) that all of mathematics is similar, and so miss out on experiencing the creative and exploratory nature of mathematical thinking. [see asking mathematical questions mathematically]

The notion of an example space is one way to think about how learners might encounter generality, as they extend the range of examples to which they have access in the future.

Recognising, or recognising and expressing a generality deserves to be the yamada(the highpoint or central point around which the lesson is constructed).

Probes and Prompts

In what ways do you call upon learners to generalise?
Ask: what does this remind you of?

Taking Action

Discuss with colleagues different ways of being more explicit about getting learners to generalise in lessons.

Look at a teaching page of your textbook and ask yourself what implicit generalities are indicated or available, and presumably intended by the author.

Case Studies

Research Sources

See Also

Categories

Concepts, Pedagogy, Themes

Comments

  Email me when this item receives a comment - You must Login to set this option

15 May 2007 15:51
The claim made in this entry is associated especially with one 'school' of maths education philosophy - not every maths educator let alone maths teacher would agree: form example, some would say that it is perfectly possible to solve a mathematical problem using a mixture of imagination and-or technique without generalising while you are doing so - the problem may itself be idiosyncratic and the method nused might be idiosyncratic also.

Mathematics is a mixture of the specific and the genheral, and to overemphasise the genheral mand gehnerality does a disservice to nthe very teafdyhers who nareb excpected to muse this resource.

15 May 2007 15:53
MY APOLOGIES - WHAT TERRIBLE TYPOS.

The claim made in this entry is associated especially with one 'school' of maths education philosophy - not every maths educator let alone maths teacher would agree: for example, some would say that it is perfectly possible to solve a mathematical problem using a mixture of imagination and-or technique without generalising while you are doing so - the problem may itself be idiosyncratic and the method used might be idiosyncratic also.

Mathematics is a mixture of the specific and the general, and to overemphasise the general and generality does a disservice to the very teachers who are expected to use this resource.
13 April 2008 12:34
Are techniques not themselves generalities? Should we not encourage learners to realise what they are doing generally? If I know that my hammer can be used on the nail that I just hammered in but am not aware of anything else, would I not benefit from the knowledge that it can be used on all nails of this type as well as other types of nail? It may seem as though I am being facetious but I am not. Without an awareness of what I am doing, of how this fits in to some general mathematical behaviour I am wasting my time.
Only registered users may comment. Login to comment

Related Items

News Rsrc. Blog Rsch.
Comm. Co. & Ev. M'Pedia

Latest Entries

Popular Entries

 

Legal   Press   Contact   About the NCETM   Recruitment   Suggestions

A Department for Children, Schools and Families initiative to enhance professional development across mathematics teaching