About cookies

The NCETM site uses cookies. Read more about our privacy policy

Please agree to accept our cookies. If you continue to use the site, we'll assume you're happy to accept them.


Personal Learning Login

Sign Up | Forgotten password?
Register with the NCETM

Secondary Magazine - Issue 37: Diary of a subject leader

This page has been archived. The content was correct at the time of original publication, but is no longer updated.
Created on 23 June 2009 by ncetm_administrator
Updated on 06 July 2009 by ncetm_administrator

Secondary Magazine Issue 37books and journals

Diary of a subject leader

Real issues in the life of a fictional Subject Leader

Some would say that I have a ‘glass half empty’ outlook on life. To some extent, this is true. Scepticism and cynicism are certainly two of my characteristics, however when it comes to education, my glass has recently been topped up.

A while ago, we were becoming increasingly aware of the need to prepare students with the necessary process skills in order for them to pass a Functional Skills exam. Early pilots had proved challenging for students, with some disappointing results, leaving many of us scratching our heads as to what to do next. The relief that a Level 2 Functional Skills qualification was no longer required to attain grade C or above came as a great relief for many in my department. However, this reaction did leave me somewhat heavyhearted. I perceive a real need to develop the process/functional skills within everyday lessons, and if assessment was to be the driving factor, so be it.

I couldn’t help but smile upon reading the QCA publication Changes to GCSE mathematics 2010 which describes the assessment objectives of the 2010 GCSE. The hopes of some, that Functional Skills was to be a thing of the past, had been quashed. Students would now be required to interpret and analyse as part of their GCSE. The need to continue developing process skills and student independence was back, much to my relief.

I distributed the QCA publication among my staff and made it a topic for discussion at our next department meeting. Once the sceptics had aired their grievances of the continual changes in government policy, the discussion focused on the practicalities ahead. How were we, as a department, going to ensure students were equipped to cope with this new style assessment?

When I read the assessment objectives within the QCA publication, I recognised the principles outlined within the Standards Unit. Students need the opportunity to explore mathematics for themselves and they can only do this through interpreting and analysing problems in a range of contexts. After all, is that not what we do as adults every day of our lives to some extent or another?

We agreed to continue using the types of activity described within the Standard Unit whenever possible, encouraging focussed discussion and a sense of exploration within the subject. My second in department and I now need to discuss how this ethos transfers to a scheme of work and whether the inclusion of ‘rich tasks’ is enough. I’m sure that providing we continue to discuss issues, share good practice and experiment with our teaching, the students’ skills will develop alongside the pedagogy within the department. It’s just a shame that it takes changes in the assessment for this to happen.

 View this issue in PDF format
 Visit the Secondary Magazine Archive
 About Magazine feeds
 Previous page
Back to top



Secondary Magazine Issue 37 - download as a PDF
Magazine Feed - keep informed of forthcoming issues
Departmental Workshops - Structured professional development activities
Explore the Secondary Forum
Contact us - share your ideas and comments 

Comment on this item  
Add to your NCETM favourites
Remove from your NCETM favourites
Add a note on this item
Recommend to a friend
Comment on this item
Send to printer
Request a reminder of this item
Cancel a reminder of this item



There are no comments for this item yet...
Only registered users may comment. Log in to comment