About cookies

The NCETM site uses cookies. Read more about our privacy policy

Please agree to accept our cookies. If you continue to use the site, we'll assume you're happy to accept them.

 

Personal Learning Login






Sign Up | Forgotten password?
 
Register with the NCETM

Stories of change - moving from '3' to '2'


This page has been archived. The content was correct at the time of original publication, but is no longer updated.
Created on 23 November 2009 by ncetm_administrator
Updated on 07 April 2010 by ncetm_administrator

I was appointed as subject leader in my school following the internal promotion of the previous post-holder to deputy head. At first I found this quite awkward, as any developments I wanted to introduce was criticising the very person who was now my line manager and this resulted in some resistance within the department.  After the first two terms I had a support meeting with my Local Authority consultant, and he suggested that I revisited our current vision statement for mathematics. On investigation it transpired that this had not been reviewed at any point since its introduction several years ago, and there had been several staffing changes since then. Once the ‘examination season’ had freed up some time, I arranged some INSET time for the whole department with the specific purpose of reviewing the current vision statement.

Before this meeting I had found several examples of vision statements from other schools. These were read and discussed by all members of the team (along with our own – anonymously). When I asked no-one recognised which was ours, which was actually rather convenient as it provided a good reason to proceed with creating a new one. The discussion gave me a good sense of what members of the team thought should be included, but I also asked everyone to provide two words that they would like to see within a new vision statement for the department.

Before this meeting I knew what I wanted to achieve within the department, and therefore what sort of tone the vision statement should have. This INSET time meant that the whole department knew what was happening, but I hope that they felt like they had contributed as a result. I couldn’t include all of their chosen words, but the overall result reflected elements of the conversations that had been had on that day. 
 

      
 
 Back
 
 
 Back to top
 
 

Quicklinks


 

 


Comment on this item  
 
Add to your NCETM favourites
Remove from your NCETM favourites
Add a note on this item
Recommend to a friend
Comment on this item
Send to printer
Request a reminder of this item
Cancel a reminder of this item

Comments

 


There are no comments for this item yet...
Only registered users may comment. Log in to comment