About cookies

The NCETM site uses cookies. Read more about our privacy policy

Please agree to accept our cookies. If you continue to use the site, we'll assume you're happy to accept them.


Personal Learning Login

Sign Up | Forgotten password?
Register with the NCETM

School D

This page has been archived. The content was correct at the time of original publication, but is no longer updated.
Created on 10 August 2010 by ncetm_administrator
Updated on 10 August 2010 by ncetm_administrator

Gloucestershire LA EiML Case Studies: School D

Nikki Pearce is subject leader at an 11-16 mixed comprehensive school with about 1 050 pupils on roll and a specialism as a Technology College. At the time of the network meeting which first introduced the EiML materials she had been in post for just over one year, as had the Key Stage 3 coordinator. The mathematics department at the school comprises 7.5 full time equivalent teachers who have six classrooms and a dedicated mathematics ICT suite between them.

For a number of reasons, Nikki decided that during her second year in post it was timely to consider a review of the curriculum in mathematics and as such chose to focus on the ‘Curriculum and lesson planning’ Key Element. We asked Nikki a few questions to establish the way in which the EiML materials have helped with this focus:

GM: How were the materials used?
NP: I was introduced to the EiML microsite and materials through the network meeting for new subject leaders that was being organised and supported by the Gloucestershire Maths Advisory Team. I took the opportunity to review all of the Key Elements and Core Responsibilities and consider what they had to offer in support of my aims for the year ahead. I also received onsite consultant support to help in developing ideas.

GM: What did you choose as a focus and why?
NP: I found that the named ‘Key Elements’ and ‘Core Responsibilities’ were a helpful categorisation of the priorities for a subject leader, irrespective of the more detailed content within them. Given the changing GCSE specifications and their incorporation of functional skills, and the fact that this is a consequence of the new secondary curriculum with its increased emphasis on process skills, I felt that it was appropriate to focus on the ‘Curriculum and lesson planning’ Key Element.

GM: What actions did you take?
NP: We met to evaluate and review our schemes of work in light of the EiML materials, and to identify appropriate areas for development. This process made it clear that there was a need for us to develop students’ functionality in mathematics. Key members of the mathematics team met with a Senior Mathematics Advisor from the National Strategies and a Secondary Mathematics Consultant from the LA with a focus on embedding best resources within a scheme of work.

GM: What is the current situation?
NP: We now have a scheme of work that incorporates functional mathematics and reflects the established departmental vision and national priorities. We have integrated small, medium and large tasks with functional elements.



Comment on this item  
Add to your NCETM favourites
Remove from your NCETM favourites
Add a note on this item
Recommend to a friend
Comment on this item
Send to printer
Request a reminder of this item
Cancel a reminder of this item



There are no comments for this item yet...
Only registered users may comment. Log in to comment