About cookies

The NCETM site uses cookies. Read more about our privacy policy

Please agree to accept our cookies. If you continue to use the site, we'll assume you're happy to accept them.

 

Personal Learning Login






Sign Up | Forgotten password?
 
Register with the NCETM

Secondary Magazine - Issue 130: Eyes Down


Created on 03 February 2016 by ncetm_administrator
Updated on 17 February 2016 by ncetm_administrator

 

Secondary Magazine Issue 130'Me & My Camera' by Alyssa L. Miller (adapted), some rights reserved
 

Eyes Down

Better together?

by Mel Muldowney, a secondary school maths teacher working in Warwickshire

We know there are topics that students often mix up - so should these be taught close together with the aim of drawing our pupils' attention to their similarities and differences, or should they be taught separated as far as possible by a period of time and by other areas of the curriculum? Concepts such as area and perimeter or mean, median, mode and range are topics that are usually used in this discussion (what do you do? Let us know)  but I’ve recently found evidence that frequency trees and probability tree diagrams should also be included.

Our department made the decision that there was a logical link between these two concepts, and so when I taught frequency trees, which is a new GCSE topic, to my year 10 group I made the link to probability trees. Finding the first incorrect answer in a recent assessment didn’t trigger any alarm bells, but after three or four answers with the same (incorrect) solution I began to wonder what these students were thinking.

During our usual “post-mortem” of the assessment all of the students that dealt with the probability trees as you would a frequency tree claim not to have even considered that the sum of the probability in each “branch” must equal 1. However, when asked about why the probability of Wendy not winning at Hoopla was 0.6 one of them instantly stated “well, that’s obvious, the probability of the events must equal 1”. When asked what could have been done to check her thinking this student said “I suppose I could have checked it by working out the probability of ALL the combinations of outcomes which must also add up to 1”. 

Was it that these two topics were taught so close together that meant the students hadn’t been able to form separate schema in their own minds? I’m not sure but it is something we will consider as we refine and revise our scheme of work.

If you have a thought-inducing picture, please send a copy (ideally, about 1-2Mb) to us at info@ncetm.org.uk with ‘Secondary Magazine Eyes Down’ in the email subject line. Include a note of where and when it was taken, and any comments on it you may have. If your picture is published, we’ll send you a £20 voucher.

Image credit
Page header by Alyssa L. Miller (adapted), some rights reserved

 
 

 

 
 
 
 
Download the magazine as a PDF
 
Secondary Magazine Archive
 
Magazine Feed - keep informed of forthcoming issues
 
Departmental Workshops - Structured professional development activities
 
Explore the Secondary Forum
 
Contact us - share your ideas and comments 
 

 


Comment on this item  
 
Add to your NCETM favourites
Remove from your NCETM favourites
Add a note on this item
Recommend to a friend
Comment on this item
Send to printer
Request a reminder of this item
Cancel a reminder of this item

Comments

 


There are no comments for this item yet...
Only registered users may comment. Log in to comment