About cookies

The NCETM site uses cookies. Read more about our privacy policy

Please agree to accept our cookies. If you continue to use the site, we'll assume you're happy to accept them.

 

Personal Learning Login






Sign Up | Forgotten password?
 
Register with the NCETM

A practical way to improve lesson planning in secondary school maths teaching?


Created on 09 January 2017 by ncetm_administrator
Updated on 30 January 2017 by ncetm_administrator
 
" I’m convinced that the benefits of having fewer lessons to plan, and of working closely with small teams to share ideas, resources and experiences, are considerable. "
 

Charlie's Angles

Thoughts on topical issues of mathematics education from the NCETM’s Director, Charlie Stripp

A practical way to improve lesson planning in secondary school maths teaching?

The answer to this question is the same as the answer to many questions related to improving teaching – ALLOW MORE TIME! – but time is a finite resource and getting ‘more’ of it is not an option; so what else might we do?

We know that detailed lesson preparation is a vital element of effective maths teaching, yet preparation time is continually squeezed out by other tasks. I’m not going to list these tasks here, or enter into a debate about their educational value, but you know the sorts of things I mean. This blog post doesn’t attempt to present solutions to those issues. Instead, it presents an idea for how maths departments might use what time is available for lesson preparation more effectively:

How can maths departments organise their teaching to enable more detailed lesson planning, and facilitate effective collaboration between maths teachers?

How many different year groups do you teach each week? How many different topics?

Could teaching across your department be organised differently, to reduce the number of different lessons you teach?

At the beginning of my career I taught in a very high-performing state school with a selective intake. In a typical week I taught five or six classes, spread across different year groups from year 7 to year 13. I was well supported by my colleagues and enjoyed my teaching, but I knew that I could have done a better job if only I had had time to improve my lesson preparation.

When I changed jobs, moving to a large sixth form/FE college, my teaching became much more specialised, focusing mainly on A level Maths and working as part of a team of maths teachers who were also focusing mainly on A level. I had taught A level Maths at my previous school, and had deluded myself that I had done it well. The school had high academic standards and I was confident that my teaching was meeting them. However, I realised very quickly that being able to focus on teaching fewer different classes, and working closely with colleagues teaching similar classes and following the same scheme of work, my teaching, and hence the learning of my students, was improving significantly. I almost always taught the same lesson at least twice to different groups of students and, even if I thought the lesson had gone well the first time, I generally felt it had gone better the second time, informed by the experience of the earlier lesson. Being able to teach the same lesson more than once meant I had fewer lessons to prepare and therefore more time to prepare them thoroughly. Often, key lessons were jointly planned and resources were shared. Because several of the team were teaching the same topics at the same time, it was easy for us to share feedback and learn from one another’s experiences too.

The benefits of teaching fewer different classes and working in teams focused on one or two year groups can be used to good effect in secondary schools. If teachers on the same teams can be timetabled to have a common free period – impossible for a whole department, but much more do-able for a small team – this can allow formal time for joint planning and the sharing of experiences. Furthermore, if teachers with different levels of experience and expertise can be deployed to work together in the same team, this will facilitate in-house professional development that can have an immediate impact in the classroom and will also help to ensure a consistent standard of teaching across classes.

I know such practices already happen, to a varying extent, in some secondary schools, but why not make them standard practice? A concern might be that teachers would lose the flexibility to teach across the full secondary age range. With suitable planning, this need not be the case. A teacher might be deployed to teach different year groups in different years, so that over a three of four year cycle they would still have the opportunity to teach across all year groups.

I have discussed these ideas with several secondary maths teachers. All felt that their work could be improved if their timetables could be organised to limit the number of different lessons they had to teach, and all would value the opportunity to work in teams that were focused on teaching the same year groups.

I’m very aware that the practicalities of implementing these ideas in school may make it very difficult. It is likely that complex staffing and timetabling issues will need to be overcome. If you organise maths teaching in this way in your school, please do let Carol Knights (the NCETM’s new Director for Secondary Mathematics) know. We would like to publish realistic case studies on the NCETM website that provide first-hand experience of what the issues are and how they can be addressed.

I’m convinced that the benefits of having fewer lessons to plan, and of working closely with small teams to share ideas, resources and experiences, are considerable. With so many demands on our time, it must make sense to do all we can to plan our work in a way that best supports the most important thing we do – teaching mathematics.

Read our case study from a school that has managed to timetable teachers to have common PPAs for collaborative planning purposes.


Comment on this item  
 
Add to your NCETM favourites
Remove from your NCETM favourites
Add a note on this item
Recommend to a friend
Comment on this item
Send to printer
Request a reminder of this item
Cancel a reminder of this item
Share |

Comments

 


11 January 2017 12:59
"Could teaching across your department be organised differently, to reduce the number of different lessons you teach?"

Well, this really got me thinking.
It's something that I believe is especially important in a department with a high proportion of non-specialist, new and/or temporary teachers.
I wonder if we could learn a lot from science and technology departments? One teacher, say a biologist or food tech teacher, teaches the same unit of topics repeatedly in a year but to different classes of a year group. So, a maths department could have a teacher who delivers the same unit to every year 8 class at some point in the year. Think of the development that would have occured by July.
Another thought I have had, as a result of reading the question quoted above is could this be applied to more than one year group? For instance the syllabus is split in to 6 units. With deliberate timetabling I could be delivering Unit C on algebraic graphs to both of my year 10 and year 11 groups at the same time. One lesson plan applying to four lessons that week.
And what if two of my colleagues were teaching Unit C at the same time as me?
And what if we were all of timetable at the same time once a fortnight..?
By DebbieBarker
         Alert us about this comment  
Only registered users may comment. Log in to comment