About cookies

The NCETM site uses cookies. Read more about our privacy policy

Please agree to accept our cookies. If you continue to use the site, we'll assume you're happy to accept them.

 

Personal Learning Login






Sign Up | Forgotten password?
 
Register with the NCETM

Reflections on the uptake of AS/A level Maths, AS/A level Further Maths and Core Maths


Created on 19 September 2017 by ncetm_administrator
Updated on 19 September 2017 by ncetm_administrator

Charlie's Angles: Reflections on the uptake of AS/A level Maths, AS/A level Further Maths and Core Maths

Increasing participation in AS/A level Maths and Further Maths is very close to my heart. In 2000 I joined the maths education charity, MEI, to develop and run a pilot programme to raise levels of participation in A level Further Maths, which eventually led to the Further Maths Support Programme, and I have continued to be involved in leading this work ever since.

Raising participation is a complex issue involving many factors, and the changes to maths education we are currently going through make it even more complex than before. However, I think there are grounds for optimism.

This summer’s AS/A level entry figures were really excellent news for maths. The graphs below show how participation in AS/A level Maths and Further Maths have increased since 2003:

The upturn in AS Further Maths entries this year is both surprising (because changes to the structure of A levels meant numbers fell for every other mainstream subject) and heartening. Universities recognise AS Further Maths as a useful qualification, supporting transition to many STEM degrees, especially Engineering and Physics, as well as Maths, and the FMSP is encouraging more universities to promote AS, as well as A level Further Maths to prospective undergraduates.

However, the current combination of the significant changes to the GCSE and A level Maths qualifications, the de-coupling of AS and A levels and funding pressures on schools and colleges means we cannot assume these trends will continue. An important impact of the de-coupling of AS and A level, combined with funding pressures, is that many schools and colleges are now offering only three, rather than four, subjects to A level students from the start of year 12. This is a particular concern for Further Maths uptake, because it is normally taken as one of four AS/A level subjects. For this reason, schools and colleges should treat Further Maths as a special case and allow students to take Further Maths as one of four AS/A levels.

Core Maths was examined for the second time this summer and numbers have increased significantly, from just under 3000, to around 5400, which is also excellent news, meaning that more young adults have stronger mathematical and statistical skills. Core Maths is valuable for any student with GCSE Maths at grade 4 or above who does not intend to take AS/A level Maths, and it has a potential cohort of many tens of thousands, but schools, colleges and teachers will need considerable support to expand participation further.

The publication of Professor Sir Adrian Smith’s review of post-16 mathematics is very welcome. It includes several recommendations that help to address these concerns. The review emphasises strongly the importance of continuing to increase participation in AS/A level Maths and Further Maths, and of raising participation in Core Maths, so that a far greater proportion of our young people study maths to beyond GCSE standard (‘level 3’) by age 18. It highlights the need to address funding concerns, extend PD opportunities and tackle other barriers to raising participation, including regional variations and low participation by girls (currently, girls make up around 40% of A level Maths students, and around 30% of A level Further Maths students, while 55% of all A levels taken in 2017 were taken by girls)

A long-standing frustration for me in trying to increase participation in AS/A level Maths and Further Maths has been schools and colleges choosing to impose high ‘entry requirements’ for students to embark on these courses. I believe that a student with a strong pass (grade 5 or above) on the new GCSE Maths should be entitled to the opportunity to study AS/A level Maths. The Smith Review includes the stark statistic that, in 2015/16, 92% of students who entered A level Maths had achieved an A or A* grade in GCSE Maths, whereas just 53% of students entering English Literature A level achieved an A or A* in English at GCSE. This is caused mainly by large numbers of schools and colleges imposing high GCSE Maths grade ‘entry requirements’ for students to embark on AS/A level Maths courses, and I believe it is very damaging. There will also be a ‘self-selection’ effect, but if schools and colleges aren’t encouraging students with B grades or equivalent to choose AS/A level Maths, they will be influencing students’ self-selection too.

A level grades in Maths and Further Maths are hugely negatively skewed. In A level Maths this summer, 42.3% of students achieved an A or A* grade. In Further Maths this figure was 58.1%. The corresponding figure for English Literature was 24.3%; for Physics it was 29.2%. The Maths grade profiles are so negatively skewed because students taking A level Maths and Further Maths tend to have disproportionately high GCSE grades for the reasons described above. Schools and colleges have justified their actions by suggesting that only top grade GCSE students can succeed in AS/A level Maths, though the data suggest otherwise.

The latest national data I am aware of on the performance of students with different GCSE Maths grades in Maths A level1 are from 2010; these are shown below, along with the corresponding graph for English, for comparison. In that year 44.8% of students got A or A* grades in A level Maths, compared to 23.1% in English Literature, much the same as now. These data certainly suggest that students with lower GCSE Maths grades can succeed at A level Maths. A grade D or E in AS/A level Maths can represent success for many students, opening opportunities for further study.

If schools and colleges had encouraged more students with grade B in GCSE Maths to begin AS/A level Maths and Further Maths in 2015, far more students could have taken it this summer and it is likely that the grade profile would have looked more like that of other A levels.

This summer saw the first cohort of students sit the new GCSE Maths, graded on the 9 – 1 scale. The new GCSE Maths has been designed to be more demanding than the previous version, and to provide a better preparation for higher level study in maths, so students with a strong pass should be better prepared than ever to progress to AS/A level Maths.

I would like schools and colleges to view the new GCSE Maths as an opportunity to rethink their entry requirements, recognising the more rigorous mathematical background students with grades 5 and 6 now have. When the GCSE Maths results came out, I published advice for schools and colleges and advice for students to encourage a wider range of students to progress to level 3 maths post-16, and to encourage schools and colleges to give them the opportunity to do so. If this advice is followed, far more students will benefit from level 3 maths.

The new Level 3 Maths Support Programme, announced by the DfE in response to the Smith review, will replace the Further Maths Support Programme, probably starting from April 2018, building from the work of the FMSP and CMSP to provide a coherent programme to support the teaching and learning of Core Maths and AS/A level Maths and Further Maths. I hope the new programme will be able to provide advice, support and professional development to help schools and colleges to enable students with a wider range of GCSE Maths grades to succeed in Core Maths, AS/A level Maths and Further Maths, and to address regional, social and gender inequalities in the uptake of level 3 maths.

From this September, the FMSP and the Maths Hubs will continue to do all they can to support Level 3 maths. In the longer term, the Level 3 Maths Support Programme, working with the Maths Hubs, can lead the drive to increase participation in maths at this level. I hope that, over the coming years, this can develop our level 3 maths provision so that far more of our young people will be able to access the post-16 maths education they need to support their future aspirations, which would also boost the economic competitiveness of our country. Another consequence would be that the grade profiles for the Maths and Further Maths A levels would be rather less negatively skewed.

Some crude modelling is revealing:

  • If the number of girls taking A level Maths this summer had been the same as the number of boys, instead of 95 000 A level Maths students there would have been 116 000. For A level Further Maths, 16 000 would have become 23 000.
  • For the sake of argument, if we assume 95% of GCSE Maths grade 9 students, 90% of grade 8s, 70% of grade 7s, 50% of grade 6s and 20% of grade 5s were to choose A level Maths, based on this summer’s GCSE results this would mean that in 2019 around 135 000 students would take A level Maths, rather than the current 95 000, and 63% of the A level Maths cohort would have grades 7, 8 or 9 (equivalent to A/A*), rather than the 92% quoted in the Smith review for 2016 - still a strong negative skew, but more in line with other subjects.
  • If we also assume 60% of grade 9s, 40% of grade 8s, 15% of grade 7s and 5% of grade 6s also took A level Further Maths, that would result in around 35 000 students taking A level Further Maths, rather than the current 16 000.

Obviously, these are very rough calculations, but they show what might be possible.

If your school or college adopted a policy of allowing B and possibly C grade students to take A level Maths in the past, I’d be very interested to hear of your experiences and future plans. Similarly, if you have a relatively even gender balance in your AS/A level Maths/Further Maths classes, what do you feel enabled you to achieve that?

Please contribute your experiences and views in the Comments section below.


1 DfE 2012 (reporting on A level results in 2010)


Comment on this item  
 
Add to your NCETM favourites
Remove from your NCETM favourites
Add a note on this item
Recommend to a friend
Comment on this item
Send to printer
Request a reminder of this item
Cancel a reminder of this item

Comments

 


05 January 2018 11:17
Why is there no mention of A-level Statistics? An accessible course for lower grade students. Also a really useful course to supplement social sciences, medical and earth sciences. In a modern world, the ability to be able to process and interpret large sets of data, and understand risk is, I would suggest, a far more valuable tool for the majority of people, than advanced algebra/calculus.

It would be wonderful to be included in discussions of level 3 provision, and to be a part of the new level 3 maths support.
By glanbraint
         Alert us about this comment  
20 November 2017 17:42
Here's a new question: In 2016 - 162741 students took AS Maths, in 2017 - 95244 took A level Maths ... What has happened to 67497 students in the intervening year? 12.7% of students failed AS, that accounts for about 20,000 - but there are still an enormous number giving up Maths. Just 59% of AS students have gone on to A2. Only Law, ICT, General Studies, Welsh and Critical Thinking have a worse progress rate. My college, with the 3 subject AS model, progression rate for Maths was 91% that year - basically almost everyone that passed continued. Where have they all gone?
By amason
         Alert us about this comment  
18 October 2017 15:36
So with Core maths (unfortunate title?) we now have a full maths curriculum offering for students with a maths GCSE grade 4 and above. This is worth celebrating. We just need to address this issue of an appropriate compulsary GCSE retake. The issue of "high entrance criteria" for A level could be addressed by offering a 1 yr AS course (with a lower entrance criteria than A level) with students moving on to A level if successful.
By Colthecalc1
         Alert us about this comment  
13 October 2017 10:16
I'd be interested to know if the data taken from the national pupil database includes students recorded as on a maths course in September of Year 12, or just students who were entered for A-level maths at the end of Y13. It's possible that retention rates are much higher for English than for maths with grade B/C GCSE students, and that the sample of C grade students making it through to the end of A-level is a self-selecting sample showing considerably higher levels of success than would be achieved by all those who start out on the course, or never considered taking it in the first place.
By G90541
         Alert us about this comment  
12 October 2017 18:50
I agree with Imeredith.. I teach IB and students with GCSE grade 4 are accepted.. they simply cannot cope with all the demands even though a good proportion of the course (Maths Studies) is related to GCSE and the papers are both calculator. Hence, A level maths being even more demanding, is not going to be easy for someone with grade 5.
By CARPINATO
         Alert us about this comment  
12 October 2017 13:51
maxhikorski, I think the 6% of Maths GCSE B grades failing A level Maths is understandable: Most of the B grade students had already failed AS Maths, so did not actually go on to take the full A level. The data is from A levels 2010, GCSEs in 2008, so the Intermediate tier had only just gone and there was still coursework - a very long time ago.
By amason
         Alert us about this comment  
12 October 2017 12:31
A pupil achieving Grade 5 Higher tier (27%-30%) to do AS/A level maths. I actually presented across my trust to SLT in January 17 serious concerns that pupils achieving just 50% (52% - Grade 7) would commence AS/A level. Currently, from a grade 7 pupils start AS having achieved success on just half the GCSE higher paper. This is in itself a concern, so to see a grade 5 being proposed is extraordinary. The logic behind the case for a student achieving 30% at GCSE going on to attain AS Level success is not present. In maths we have made huge progress in establishing stronger fluency foundation building blocks for success. Grade 5 pupils simply do not have the algebraic basics required for success. Core Maths is a superb course ideally suited to these pupils and equally grade 6 students also. Aspiration is great, but it must match a reality check.
By imeredith
         Alert us about this comment  
12 October 2017 11:38
The figure above, that only 6% of Maths GCSE B grade students fail maths A Level, is hard to believe. That is the only reason that we insisted students had an A or A* to do A Level Maths, because the pass rate for those with a B grade was unacceptable (although we would take those with a B grade if there were background reasons). It's possible that we should have done better as a department (there were background reasons there too) but I think that figure of 6% needs looking into and unpacking.

You don't mention value-added, Charlie; the way some organisations calculate this can militate against taking on those with lower GCSE grades. We felt with ALPs that the methodology made it much easier to hit target grades for the top end, and much harder for the bottom end. This was because the regression line chosen was that for all subjects, and not just that for mathematics. We pointed out the unreasonableness of this several times, but got no sensible reply. .
By maxhikorski
         Alert us about this comment  
21 September 2017 17:10
Here are my (very large) college's figures for percentage of students taking Maths:
Last year, 91% of the A*, 58% of the As, 23% of the Bs, 7% of the Cs. Total 38%
This year 95% of the 9s, 73% of the 8s, 42% of the 7s, 12% of the 6s. Total 28%
Some of this drop is due to the loss of Use of Maths, some of it due to nobody doing 4 A levels (except FMaths which we argued should be taken as a 4th), some of this drop is due to college expansion, but maybe in other areas.
Disappointingly, our lowest total AS Mathematics cohort since 2012.
By amason
         Alert us about this comment  
Only registered users may comment. Log in to comment